First composed and performed in 1965, Variations V is a true testament to 1960's experiments with "intermedia"—a coexistence and cutting across of artistic genres that profoundly informed Cunningham's choreographic practice. Video is materially integrated into the performance, with projections by Stan VanDerBeek and overlaid TV distortions by Nam June Paik enveloping the dancers. Twelve sound-sensitive electronic poles dot the stage; sound is triggered by the dancers' movements and then altered or delayed by the musicians. Variations V predates Cunningham's "video-dances," demonstrating a different moment in his relation to the technology.A kind of explicit, corporeal engagement with video as medium is reflected in the performance's sound component. Sound, like video, exists in this dance visually and even kinetically. The viewer of this 1966 archival performance gains access to the locus of sound production, seeing John Cage and David Tudor perched over a wide spread of electronic equipment. Cunningham pays attention to the musicians' movements in his 1968 book Changes: Notes on Choreography, their "constant scuttling" moving "back and forth on the platform to fix things, wiring that came out, a plug, etc." The performance moves dialectically between its phenomenological whole and the "varied" elements of sound, video and dance that constitute it.Unlike most of Cage and Cunningham's collaborations, sound and movement are more technically codependent than autonomous in Variations V. Cunningham writes in Changes, "John decided to find out if there might not be ways that sound could be affected by movement, and he and David Tudor proceeded to find out that there were."The twelve five-foot high, antennae-like poles each have a four-foot spherical sound radius to produce sound as dancers enter it. To further "vary" the composition, each antenna produced a different sound. Billy Klüver of Bell Laboratories devised the second sound source, which entailed photo-electric cells at the bottom of the poles, which trigger sound as dancers' shadows interrupt their light source. Cunningham likens the process to doors opening at a supermarket in turn, deemphasizing the collaboration between dance and sound. He comments how "the dancers triggered a sound but the kind of a sound, how long it might be, or the POSSIBLE REPETITION OF IT WAS CONTROL-led by the musicians," with their oscillators, short-wave radios and tape recorders. Nevertheless, the composition for Variations V was written only after its first performance, the dancers' movement leaving an indelible imprint on the sound.Cunningham's non-narrative, anti-psychological focus on "dance itself" imposes a relation of kinetic immediacy between the dancers and their environment. There is the actual documentation of the performance and then there is the video that constitutes the performance, which in itself varies in its approach. VanDerBeek and Paik use video differently in Variations V, while both providing backgrounds, and at times superimposed foregrounds, to the dancers' movement. VanDerBeek projects images sourced from popular culture alongside rehearsal footage of the dancers made in Cunningham's studio. In his montage, VanDerBeek sets up a comparison between Cunningham's dance and other socio-historical legacies of movement, including factory piecework, fishing, cartoons, women applying makeup and air travel. He historically contextualizes the dance by placing it outside of its kinetic immediacy as an image of movement among many. At the same time, VanDerBeek celebrates Cunningham's creative ability to move towards an unmediated movement and to operate in the moment. In his wave-like abstract TV distortions, Paik embraces the kinetic immediacy of Cunningham and Cage's compositions. Like the subjective remove Cunningham articulated through dance's movement, Paik saw his TV manipulations as, "NOT the expression of my personality, but merely PHYSICAL MUSIC," as he described to Charlotte Moorman in 1974. Whereas VanDerBeek complicates the dance's purely kinetic presence, Paik's videos upturn historical imagery in favor of iconoclasm.While explicit invocations of Marcel Duchamp are seen in works such as Walkaround Time (1968), Cunningham subtly interweaves Duchampian themes into Variations V, through what he calls "non-dance" activities. In his 2000 article "The Readymade as Movement" for Res 38, dance professor and author Mark Franko conceptually links Cunningham's interest in pedestrian movement to the Duchampian readymade by arguing "that bodies in ordinary motion are dance readymades." Examples of "non-dance" activities in Variations V include Cunningham potting a large plant and having Carolyn Brown smash the pot, only to re-pot it. Barbara Lloyd puts a towel on her head and then performs a headstand as Gus Solomons rocks her body back and forth. Both the towel and pot had microphones attached to them, so that any movements would produce sound. Towards the end of the dance, the dancers pull out a spool of white thread to connect them. This gesture cites Duchamp's 1942 installation, Mile of String, in which he made an unwieldy web of string throughout a Surrealist painting exhibition restricting the movement of exhibition-goers. The dance ends as Cunningham rides a bicycle across the stage, putting back to use Duchamp's infamous first readymade.Variations V is simultaneously an homage and revision to this modernist legacy, infused as it is with both the immediacy of movement and its conceptual tensions with video.Choreography: Merce Cunningham. Music: John Cage, "Variations V." Distortion of TV images: Nam June Paik. Film images: Stan VanDerBeek. Produced by Studio Hamburg, Nordeutscher Rundfunk.
变奏曲5免费完整版在线
该片的故事情节非常复杂，让观众在观看电影的过程中需要思考和推理，非常有趣。
变奏曲5免费观看在线
国庆档怎么能没有一部喜剧呢？在我看来，魏翔是一位值得信任的喜剧演员，虽然他成名晚至今名气都不算大，但是他主演的喜剧质量一直都不错，是可以吸引我进电影院的。热血沸腾这部电影，讲的是对胜利无比执着的篮球教练魏国铮，因违规受罚被迫进入一所特殊的学校支教。我非常喜欢这一类的题材，非常具有碰撞性，在新旧理念的碰撞中，既会闹出一些“笑话”，彼此也会得到一些成长。电影需要一些轻松的题材，但这些喜剧通常不仅仅是为了轻松，也会赋予一些值得探讨的现实意义。魏翔的表演是令人信服，真诚就是最好
变奏曲5手机在线电影免费
舒克贝塔的卧底行动十分艰辛，但他始终坚定勇敢，没有放弃。影片中的情节紧凑且充满紧张感，让人紧张兴奋。
变奏曲5电影免费版高清在线观看
该剧
